Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q +1317%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
GRID
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
192
Shading Units
8
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
12W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy