CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800
VS
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
AMD Radeon PRO W7800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800
+1856%
44.78 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
VS
Radeon PRO W7800
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Apr 2023
GRID
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2499 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
70
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
4480
128
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
70
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
319.9 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
699.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.56 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.78 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1399 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
260W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
2
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q
3
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
4
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB
5
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Instinct MI300X
6
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
7
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
8
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
9
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB
10
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
Related News
1
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
2
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
3
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
4
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
5
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
6
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
7
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
8
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
9
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
10
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy