Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800 +1856%
44.78 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Apr 2023
GRID
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2499 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
70
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
4480
128
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
70
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
319.9 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
699.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.56 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.78 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1399 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
260W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy