Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
16 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (18W vs 32W)
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jan 2007
NVS
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

18W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV516
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy