Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
7488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +2891%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro CX
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
7680
64
TMUs
240
24
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy