CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216
VS
NVIDIA Quadro CX
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216
+2958%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
VS
Tesla PG500 216
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro CX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
80
192
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
24
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla M40
2
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
3
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
4
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile
5
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
6
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
7
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
8
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090
9
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy