Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI60

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI60

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 32GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1024GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI60 +18337%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1024GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.373 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
Vega 20
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy