Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
More VRAM (768GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 134W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600 +187%
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
4
96
Shading Units
32
24
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
96 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

134W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
G84
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy