Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile +2802%
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Sep 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1275 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
72
192
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
24
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
419.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU102
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy