Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M +1153%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
192
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G86
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy