Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
13120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +13783%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
13312
16
TMUs
832
8
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy