Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Tesla X2090 +308%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF110
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy