Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 800W)
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M +23%
0.768 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
752 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
576
Shading Units
240
48
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
800W
-
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GT200B
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy