Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +471%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
0.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1344
Shading Units
128
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
368.6 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

108W
TDP
171W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G80
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy