Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (2100MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
18688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +9048%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
19456
48
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
750W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
MI300
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
146 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy