Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q +285%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
1024
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
259.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
259.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
TU104
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy