Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 211.6GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000
4.252 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +225%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

861 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
7680
128
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy