Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1545MHz
Lower TDP (160W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000
7.119 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +107%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
8192
144
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
8 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy