Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E2400 vs AMD FirePro M6000

ATI Radeon E2400 vs AMD FirePro M6000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 43W)
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
600 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000 +2033%
1.024 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2012
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
10
40
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
48.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Heathrow
-
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
43W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy