Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 58% (2000MHz vs 1266MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +42%
5.834 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Aug 2022
Embedded
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1024
144
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
DG2-128
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy