Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +642%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy