Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
RV380
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Rage 9
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
130 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy