Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7700 +290%
31.95 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

48
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
4096
192
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
64
-
-
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
Fiji
Navi 32
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy