Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
6136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +266508%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

96
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
6144
Shading Units
8
384
TMUs
4
192
ROPs
4
-
-
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

295W
TDP
12W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
G98
Navi 31
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy