Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +2341%
0.952 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GT218
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
18W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy