Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +12700%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
40
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
32W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV620
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy