Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +1404%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
-
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
24
2560
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
24
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy