Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1543MHz vs 1358MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +25%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
12 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy