Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +22720%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
2
3328
Shading Units
16
104
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
8
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
34W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
G96
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy