CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+22720%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
VS
Quadro FX 380
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
2
3328
Shading Units
16
104
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
8
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
34W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
G96
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x1
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
Related News
1
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
2
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
3
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
4
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
5
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
6
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
7
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
8
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
9
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
10
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy