Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090 +2734%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
512
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
N10M-GLM
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy