Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm +5773%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
32
224
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
42W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy