Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +431%
5.468 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
448
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GA107S
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy