Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal +1946%
10.97 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
28
SM Count
27
3584
Shading Units
216
224
TMUs
72
96
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GT200
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy