GeForce GTX 260M vs Radeon Pro 575
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 575 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Radeon Pro 575 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (217.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
1936 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
308
Radeon Pro 575
+1357%
4489
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 200M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1695 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
217.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
35.07 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
140.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.489 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.489 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
280.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
150W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
Polaris 20
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XL
(215-0910052)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4