GeForce GTX 295 vs FirePro S9150
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (235W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
FirePro S9150
+750%
5069
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
512bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
28
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
235W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Hawaii
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3