GeForce MX250 vs Radeon E9560 PCIe
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9560 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 130W)
Radeon E9560 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1237MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
Radeon E9560 PCIe
+615%
5700
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2019
GeForce MX
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1237 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.58 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
178.1 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.700 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.700 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
356.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
130W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4