Quadro NVS 450 vs Quadro M2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 450 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro NVS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 450
19
Quadro M2000
+9300%
1786
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.920 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
1.920 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
19.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GM206
G98-875-U2
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
80 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
