Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
Lower TDP (400W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +6%
14.75 TFLOPS
GRID A100B
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2020
Data Center GPU
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
8192
Shading Units
6912
256
TMUs
432
128
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
400W
900 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy