CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1560MHz
Lower TDP (130W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+15%
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A3000 Mobile
12.78 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
RTX A3000 Mobile
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
32
8192
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
199.7 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.78 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.78 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
199.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
130W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K540Q
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
Related News
1
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
2
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
3
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
4
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
5
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
6
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
7
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
8
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
9
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
10
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy