Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 1133GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1597MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB +10%
16.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2019
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1245 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1597 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
8192
Shading Units
5120
256
TMUs
320
128
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
204.4 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
511.0 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.71 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.35 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.177 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
250W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Volta
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy