Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP

AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 8250 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 126% (905MHz vs 400MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (8W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +581%
0.695 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8250 IGP
0.102 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2013
Trinity
Generation
Temash
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
128
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
102.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.400 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
8W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Kalindi
A300
GPU Variant
Kalindi LP
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
1.178 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
110 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy