Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD FirePro RG220A vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 35W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Jan 2007
FirePro Remote
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
RV516
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy