Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs Intel Arc A350

AMD FirePro S9150 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +65%
5.069 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
25W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
DG2-128
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy