Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
288 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 74W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800 +15%
1.104 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Dec 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

74W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy