Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M vs AMD FirePro M3900

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 350M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 28W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 350M
0.24 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Oct 2010
GeForce 300M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
160
32
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

28W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Seymour
N11E-GE1
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy