CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
NVIDIA A40 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
10560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
A40 PCIe
+7744%
37.42 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
VS
A40 PCIe
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Oct 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
695.8GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
84
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
10752
64
TMUs
336
28
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
194.9 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
584.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
37.42 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.42 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
584.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA102
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Board Design
182W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 580
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy