Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +613%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Tahiti
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy