Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

VS

Intel Arctic Sound M

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages

Lower TDP (500W vs 2400W)

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages

Released 1 years late

Boost Clock1600MHz

More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 1229GB/s)

8192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Intel Arctic Sound M

14.75 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +255%

52.43 TFLOPS

Intel Arctic Sound M

VS

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

Jan 2023

Xe Graphics

Generation

Data Center GPU

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

900 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1600 MHz

1200 MHz

Memory Clock

1565 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

128GB

HBM2e

Memory Type

HBM2e

4096bit

Memory Bus

8192bit

1229GB/s

Bandwidth

3205GB/s

Render Config

-

8192

Shading Units

16384

256

TMUs

1024

128

ROPs

0

-

Tensor Cores

1024

-

RT Cores

128

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per EU)

8 MB

L2 Cache

408 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

0 MPixel/s

230.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

1638 GTexel/s

29.49 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

52.43 TFLOPS

14.75 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

52.43 TFLOPS

3.686 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W

TDP

2400W

900 W

Suggested PSU

2800 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

8-pin EPS

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512

GPU Name

Ponte Vecchio

-

Generation 12.7

Architecture

Generation 12.5

TSMC

Foundry

Intel

6 nm

Process Size

10 nm

21.7 billion

Transistors

100 billion

406 mm²

Die Size

1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

2

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB

3

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K10

4

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

5

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

6

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

7

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID K540Q

8

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

9

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA GRID K140Q

10

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU