Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

VS

Intel Arctic Sound M Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages

Lower TDP (500W vs 2400W)

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages

Released 1 years late

Boost Clock1600MHz

More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 1229GB/s)

8192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Intel Arctic Sound M

14.75 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +255%

52.43 TFLOPS

Intel Arctic Sound M

VS

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

Jan 2023

Xe Graphics

Generation

Data Center GPU

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

900 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1600 MHz

1200 MHz

Memory Clock

1565 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

128GB

HBM2e

Memory Type

HBM2e

4096bit

Memory Bus

8192bit

1229GB/s

Bandwidth

3205GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

8192

Shading Units

16384

256

TMUs

1024

128

ROPs

0

-

Tensor Cores

1024

-

RT Cores

128

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per EU)

8 MB

L2 Cache

408 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

0 MPixel/s

230.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

1638 GTexel/s

29.49 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

52.43 TFLOPS

14.75 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

52.43 TFLOPS

3.686 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

52.43 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512

GPU Name

Ponte Vecchio

-

GPU Variant

-

Generation 12.7

Architecture

Generation 12.5

TSMC

Foundry

Intel

6 nm

Process Size

10 nm

21.7 billion

Transistors

100 billion

406 mm²

Die Size

1280 mm²

Board Design

500W

TDP

2400W

900 W

Suggested PSU

2800 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

8-pin EPS

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

-

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

2

Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon 780M

3

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

4

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M

5

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

6

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

7

NVIDIA GRID K520 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

8

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

9

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

10

Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI6

Related News

1

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

2

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

3

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

4

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly

5

NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products

6

NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs

7

Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon

8

Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!

9

Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs

10

Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher