Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA A10M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA A10M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
7136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
A10M +29200%
23.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
56
32
Shading Units
7168
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GA102
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy