Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 78W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700 +250%
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
14
32
Shading Units
112
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
78W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
G92
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy