Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 420 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (40W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M +263%
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 420
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
1
32
Shading Units
8
16
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
G98
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy